Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55.8% saturation with 2,422 hits. Analysis detected 7,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,341 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,769 of 16,562 topics). This Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
Topic details
Total words: 4,341
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.3% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 55.8%55.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.7%30.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 55.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos