Author summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Harris results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 1,408 hits . Analysis detected 8,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,745 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,297 of 6,601 authors). This John Harris is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. John Harris
Author details
Total words: 4,745
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.4% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 29.7% 29.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst