Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Humphreys results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Pessimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 783 hits . Analysis detected 5,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,289 of 6,279 authors). This Keith Humphreys is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Keith Humphreys
Author details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.5% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.5% 17.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.8% 18.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.5%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst