Topic summary
68% 22 analyzed articles/videos 12,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Fauci results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 5,090 hits . Analysis detected 47,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,843 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (18,069 of 23,257 topics). This Anthony Fauci is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Anthony Fauci
Topic details
Total words: 55,843
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score22 analyzed articles55.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst