Publication summary
77% 21 analyzed articles/videos 8,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Post Millennial results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,909 hits . Analysis detected 33,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,742 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 58% (234 of 553 publications). This The Post Millennial is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 37,742
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score21 analyzed articles37.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst