Publication summary
1% 1 analyzed article/video 3,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signal Cleveland results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 0.7% saturation with 100 hits . Analysis detected 450 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.2% and a BS Rank of 0% (470 of 470 publications). This Signal Cleveland is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 14,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst