Publication summary
2% 10 analyzed articles/videos 8,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These BridgeDetroit results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 1,236 hits . Analysis detected 11,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,642 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (537 of 541 publications). This BridgeDetroit is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 48,642
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 0.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles48.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst