Publication summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The White House results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Begging the Question , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 1,155 hits . Analysis detected 3,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (6 of 395 publications). This The White House is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,204
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.7% percentile 8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 37.5% 37.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 52.4% 52.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 29.9% 29.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Publication 8.5% 8.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Publication 52.4%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 37.5%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 29.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst