Publication summary
96%1 analyzed article/video551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The White House results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 1,155 hits. Analysis detected 3,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (6 of 395 publications). This The White House is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
The White House
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
99%The White House (selected)9%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 2,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

99% percentile
025507510098.7% percentile
8.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Publication 37.5%37.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 52.4%52.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 29.9%29.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Publication 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Publication 52.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 37.5%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 29.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos