Author summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nushrat Rahman results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,544 of 8,260 authors). This Nushrat Rahman is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Nushrat Rahman
Author details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst