Author summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video4,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Martin results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 0.2% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (8,233 of 8,233 authors). This Hannah Martin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hannah Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin (selected)1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,018
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos