Author summary
6%2 analyzed articles/videos1,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabelle Tavares results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 789 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,092 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (6,603 of 8,260 authors). This Isabelle Tavares is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Isabelle Tavares
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
21%Isabelle Tavares (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,092
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate