BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 817 faulty-reasoning hits from 962 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.4% and a BS Rank of 30% (17,676 of 25,181 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the article peer group.

The Thečhíȟila Collective was ecstatic when it finally secured land from the Detroit Land Bank Authority for a Native center, after an uphill battle to purchase long-vacant property last year. 
But in July, the land bank threatened to take the property back, alleging the collective failed to provide a required update in a third “final demand” letter addressed to the wrong mailing and email addresses. 
The collective was required to provide evidence of working on its plan for the property, including removing trash and constructing a medicinal garden and pow-wow grounds. 
The issue was resolved only after the Indigenous collective reached out to the land bank to purchase more land next to its property. 
On the vacant stretch of land in Detroit on Tillman tucked between I-94 and I-96 that had sat empty in the in the land bank’s hands for more than a decade, the Thečhíȟila Collective  made up of 30 land stewards  planted trees, a sacred garden with sage, tobacco and sweetgrass and a medicine garden. 
The purchase came after the land bank initially raised the price by 2,000% once the collective inquired about buying it, causing a back-and-forth before the land bank ultimately sold the group the land at a 50% discount. 
Following BridgeDetroit’s reporting, a land bank-wide 50% discount was created for “federally recognized American Indian Tribe or Alaska Native Entity” members on auction properties. 
Volunteers clear grass and invasive plants on the Thečhíȟila Collective’s land, including a space being prepared to store tools. 
The group holds work days most Sundays to build out the property with donated materials and volunteer labor. 
(Bridge Detroit photo by Brayan Gutierrez) 
The collective has hosted liberation events with Palestinian and Mexican groups, children have played baaga’adowewin  the game from which French settlers created lacrosse  and the group plans to purchase more property to create sustainable housing. 
Jaike Spotted Wolf, founder of the collective, said she couldn’t believe the land bank was alleging they were in default. 
She said she sent progress reports and pictures as required, and had never received any prior letters to the alleged final one which was addressed to the wrong physical and mailing address. 
“It never ceases with the land bank,” said Spotted Wolf. 
Sweetgrass and other traditional medicine plants growing in beds on the collective’s land. 
The group hopes the space will eventually include a stage for Native artists and teens, a sacred fire, and grounds for powwow and prayer. 
(Bridge Detroit photo by Brayan Gutierrez) 
The land bank was established in 2008 to return Detroit’s vacant land to productive use, and has sold approximately half of the vacant land it started with to Detroiters for homes, gardens, and other community projects, leaving currently a little more than 59,000 vacant properties in its inventory. 
But Detroiters across the city have encountered a range of issues with the city’s largest property owner, from the authority wrongly alleging homeowners were trespassing to trying to take back homes for slow repairs while giving developers longer to renovate, and undisclosed issues with the properties costing homebuyers more than expected. 
Many have expressed frustration about not being able to buy property in the inventory  land set aside for special projects and developers. 
Initially, land bank spokesperson Nicole Simmons said the collective’s address was wrong because the compliance team used the information on file that was provided to contact the group about issues with the properties. 
The issue was resolved when the collective reached out, Simmons said. 
“The Collective subsequently connected with the DLBA, updated its contact information, and worked with our team to clarify next steps. 
Based on those communications, the issues related to the potential default have been resolved,” Simmons said by email. 
However, a purchasing agreement and an email thread from last year both show the correct address. 
In a follow up comment, Simmons said she would look into how the addresses got changed. 
The default allegations came about while the collective was seeking to buy more land bank property. 
The collective has secured a $50,000 grant from Flagstar to build five units of sustainable, off-grid housing “true to Anishinaabe tradition and culture,” said Spotted Wolf. 
A representative from Flagstar declined to provide comment on details. 
The collective still has $10,000 leftover from a larger EarthRising grant to buy the first properties, as well. 
Through BridgeDetroit’s reporting, Spotted Wolf learned the land bank claimed the Tribal Member discount was never used in Thečhíȟila Collective’s purchase. 
She shared emails and texts showing she submitted proof of tribal membership and that program manager Ben Newman confirmed a 50% discount. 
A volunteer helps tend the Thečhíȟila Collective’s land. 
Spotted Wolf said the group is selective about who it works with, watching how people follow through on commitments rather than relying on contracts or donations alone. 
She said the collective welcomes allies willing to support quietly, without taking a leading role, as it works to reclaim and rebuild the space for future generations. 
(Bridge Detroit photo by Brayan Gutierrez) 
Land bank spokesperson Simmons said the Tribal Member discount was not used but confirmed the board approved a separate 50% discount citing “unique circumstances” based on the group’s plans, commitment to rehabilitate the property, and proof of funds. 
Spotted Wolf said that distinction was never communicated to her. 
The Tribal Member discount only applies to structures sold in the auction  not vacant land  Simmons said. 
Spotted Wolf said the discount should apply to vacant land as well. 
“We’re crying for space in a space that used to be all Native,” she said. 
“This used to be Anishinaabe land, Anishinaabe territory and now you may not be able to tell me the name of a Anishinaabe neighbor.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Jena Brooker: 0.4%BridgeDetroit: 0.9%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 3.8%Jena Brooker: 0.3%BridgeDetroit: 0.4%Anchoring Bias3.8%This article: 5.0%Jena Brooker: 1.1%BridgeDetroit: 1.1%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.3%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.3%BridgeDetroit: 0.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Jena Brooker: 10.5%BridgeDetroit: 1.1%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Jena Brooker: 1.5%BridgeDetroit: 2.3%Optimism Bias9.6%This article: 2.1%Jena Brooker: 0.4%BridgeDetroit: 0.3%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 12.4%Jena Brooker: 6.1%BridgeDetroit: 2.5%Negativity Bias12.4%This article: 9.5%Jena Brooker: 4.1%BridgeDetroit: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias9.5%This article: 1.1%Jena Brooker: 0.3%BridgeDetroit: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error1.1%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Jena Brooker: 0.6%BridgeDetroit: 0.8%In-Group Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Jena Brooker: 2.0%BridgeDetroit: 2.1%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Jena Brooker: 0.2%BridgeDetroit: 0.5%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.6%BridgeDetroit: 0.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.1%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Jena Brooker: 2.5%BridgeDetroit: 1.3%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%Jena Brooker: 1.3%BridgeDetroit: 1.7%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.1%Jena Brooker: 0.3%BridgeDetroit: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.1%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.2%Jena Brooker: 0.1%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Burden of Proof1.2%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.4%Jena Brooker: 0.2%BridgeDetroit: 0.7%Anecdotal2.4%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.0%Jena Brooker: 0.3%BridgeDetroit: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.5%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.2%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.1%Jena Brooker: 2.6%BridgeDetroit: 0.8%Biased Writer Voice1.1%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.6%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jena Brooker: 0.0%BridgeDetroit: 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

962 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers46%attributed speech518writer words
Selected voice

Jaike Spotted Wolf

100%flagged-word coverage
225 attributed words51% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Jaike Spotted Wolf: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.