Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Detroit Land Bank results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 227 hits . Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,886 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 20,842 topics). This Detroit Land Bank is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Detroit Land Bank
Topic details
Total words: 2,886
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst