Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video3,595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland Politics results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 0.7% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 450 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (18,094 of 18,098 topics). This Cleveland Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cleveland Politics
Topic details
Total words: 14,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos