Author summary
7% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Walker results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 858 hits . Analysis detected 2,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,652 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (7,947 of 8,250 authors). This Micah Walker is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Micah Walker
Author details
Total words: 10,652
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.7% percentile 1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst