Author summary
56% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberto Wakerell-Cruz results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 961 hits . Analysis detected 7,559 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,656 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,649 of 8,351 authors). This Roberto Wakerell-Cruz is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Roberto Wakerell-Cruz
Author details
Total words: 9,656
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst