Publication summary
90% 12 analyzed articles/videos 3,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Events results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 2,608 hits . Analysis detected 22,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,836 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (136 of 546 publications). This Human Events is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 18,836
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score12 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst