Author summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayden Cunningham results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 530 hits . Analysis detected 4,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,396 of 8,417 authors). This Hayden Cunningham is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Hayden Cunningham
Author details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.9% 8.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst