Publication summary
72% 16 analyzed articles/videos 6,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Post Millennial results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 2,994 hits . Analysis detected 24,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,632 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (253 of 546 publications). This The Post Millennial is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 27,632
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles27.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst