EBay to pay $56 MILLION to elderly couple after staff sent live cockroaches, fetal pig to their home in retaliation against critical newsletter coverage 44%

By Thomas Stevenson59%

7/31/2026, 2:50:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.6% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 883 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 44% (14,737 of 26,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the article peer group.

E-commerce giant eBay has settled a lawsuit and agreed to shell out $56 million to a couple that its staff targeted with live cockroaches, a fetal pig, death threats, as well as in-person surveillance. 
The shop and selling platform and several of its top executives have agreed to pay $56 million in compensation to David and Ina Steiner, an elderly couple in Massachusetts that were targeted by staff at the company in 2019 with anonymous deliveries that included a fetal pig, live cockroaches, live spiders, a bloody pig Halloween mask, a funeral wreath, and a book about surviving the death of a spouse. 
The Steiners, who ran an e-commerce industry newsletter called EcommerceBytes that had run negative coverage of eBay, alleged in a lawsuit that the anonymous deliveries and death threats were part of a coordinated campaign from the company to silence them into stopping their reporting on eBay. 
Additionally, their home address was posted online with public invitations for adult activities, and threats were posted against them on then-Twitter. 
The executives also reportedly turned up at the Steiners’ home to put trackers on their cars. 
With the settlement, the company admitted that the situation "never should have happened" and that what the Steiners had to deal with was "reprehensible" and "wrong." 
“This agreement is consistent with our commitment to fairly compensate the Steiners and fulfills our efforts to make things right,” a spokesperson said, per Dexerto. 
Former eBay CEO Devin Wenig is paying $2 million himself after communications with him and other executives have surfaced in the lawsuit. 
Wenig was found to have said "take her down" to another executive regarding Ina Steiner. 
The lawyer for the couple, Christopher Murphy of Scalli Murphy Law PC, said that the “resolution sends a clear message that corporations and their executives cannot engage in this type of misconduct without facing significant consequences.” 
The couple's civil complaint against the company follows a criminal investigation against eBay that resolved years earlier when seven employees were criminally charged in 2020. 
James Baugh, who was the company's former senior director of safety and security, was sentenced to five years in prison over the case. 
The company had to pay $3 million in criminal penalties. 
The lawsuit was framed as an effort to "prevent similar corporate misconduct and protect First Amendment rights." 
The settlement does not have a confidentiality agreement, meaning that the Steiners are not blocked from talking about the case publicly after its resolution. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.9%Thomas Stevenson: 8.8%The Post Millennial: 6.6%Confirmation Bias21.9%This article: 2.3%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 19.6%Thomas Stevenson: 4.0%The Post Millennial: 3.2%Availability Heuristic19.6%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.8%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.4%Hindsight Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 26.1%Thomas Stevenson: 14.0%The Post Millennial: 10.8%Framing Effect26.1%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 8.3%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Status Quo Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 1.6%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 43.6%Thomas Stevenson: 9.7%The Post Millennial: 9.2%Negativity Bias43.6%This article: 14.1%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.9%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 3.0%The Post Millennial: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 1.4%Recency Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Thomas Stevenson: 3.3%The Post Millennial: 2.1%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.9%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Circular Reasoning3.9%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 5.8%The Post Millennial: 4.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.5%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion3.5%This article: 10.6%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Begging the Question10.6%This article: 5.8%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.9%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.3%Anecdotal15.9%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Unattributed Quote3.5%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.0%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.2%The Post Millennial: 4.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 8.7%The Post Millennial: 5.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.4%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

433 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker8.3%attributed speech397writer words
Selected voice

Christopher Murphy

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words100% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Unattributed Quote-3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Christopher Murphy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.