Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Murphy results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (11,079 of 38,682 speakers). This Christopher Murphy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Christopher Murphy
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠72%Christopher Murphy (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos