Speaker summary
28%1 analyzed article/video3,573.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conor Heffernan results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 1.2% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 307 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,573.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 0% (37,375 of 37,376 speakers). This Conor Heffernan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Conor Heffernan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan (selected)1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 3,573.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos