Author summary
⁠12%2 analyzed articles/videos7,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghna Chakrabarti results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 1,542 hits. Analysis detected 9,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,010 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (6,312 of 6,351 authors). This Meghna Chakrabarti is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Meghna Chakrabarti
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Meghna Chakrabarti (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 31,010
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles31K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos