Author summary
59%6 analyzed articles/videos1,865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Stevenson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,166 hits. Analysis detected 7,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,350 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,264 of 8,417 authors). This Thomas Stevenson is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Thomas Stevenson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Thomas Stevenson (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,350
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 8.7%8.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate