MAMDANI’S NEW YORK: At least 50 children shot in NYC in 2026 as mom of 12-year-old victim speaks out 27%

By Thomas Stevenson59%

7/31/2026, 6:34:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Loss Aversion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 418 faulty-reasoning hits from 445 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of 27% (19,219 of 26,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the article peer group.

Thus far in 2026, there have been 50 children shot in New York City after socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani took office, with one of the latest victims being 12-year-old boy Jacob Freytes. 
During the first half of 2026 alone, 49 of the shooting victims in the Big Apple were under 18 years of age, per the New York Post. 
Similarly, there have been 49 shooters who have also been under the age of 18. 
The numbers are figures from January through June, about a month before a stray bullet in the Bronx struck a 12-year-old boy. 
Freytes, who is the son of a retired NYPD sergeant, was buying a ball at a bodega when a shootout took place on the street. 
After getting shot, he ran into the bodega, where he collapsed and was later declared deceased at a nearby hospital. 
The July 25 shooting is the latest example of gun violence that has impacted teens in the city. 
Freytes' mother, Migdalia Martinez, spoke out this week after the tragic loss of her son, telling reporters, “Criminals feel more safe now than ever." 
She told the Post that the problem is with the courts, and that they are “holding the hand” of criminals. 
“There’s no more doing time for misdemeanors. 
There’s no bail  People are just walking free with the possibilities. 
The system works more for the criminal than they’re gonna work for the victim," she added. 
"He doesn't have a life anymore. 
He didn't never get to reach 13. 
He will never graduate high school. 
And the guy that killed him did. 
He will never have a girlfriend, and the guy that killed him did. 
He will never have kids. 
And that guy that killed him did," she told NBC New York. 
She added that her son only got to live "some" of his life, and then added, "I just want him to do the rest." 
Two days before the shooting of Freytes, a 15-year-old got shot in the foot in Brooklyn during a dispute. 
On July 20, a 17-year-old girl was shot in a McDonald's parking lot. 
The number of shootings, however, has dropped from the same timeframe last year where there were 57 in the first half of 2025. 
And although the number of shootings involving all ages has hit a low mark, the number of perpetrators who are under 18 has gone up. 22 percent of all shootings during the first six months of the year were carried out by minors, the Post reported. 
In 2018, that was just 8 percent. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.5%Thomas Stevenson: 8.8%The Post Millennial: 6.4%Confirmation Bias17.5%This article: 1.6%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 0.6%Anchoring Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.0%The Post Millennial: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 19.8%Thomas Stevenson: 14.0%The Post Millennial: 10.6%Framing Effect19.8%This article: 12.6%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Loss Aversion12.6%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Thomas Stevenson: 9.7%The Post Millennial: 9.0%Negativity Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Thomas Stevenson: 1.9%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error8.1%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 3.0%The Post Millennial: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 1.4%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 3.3%The Post Millennial: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.6%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 1.9%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.9%Thomas Stevenson: 5.8%The Post Millennial: 4.8%Hasty Generalization9.9%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.0%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.2%The Post Millennial: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Thomas Stevenson: 8.7%The Post Millennial: 5.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.4%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

445 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker36%attributed speech286writer words
Selected voice

Migdalia Martinez

73%flagged-word coverage
159 attributed words100% of attributed speech44% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Politically Right Leaning -17.8 ptsWriter: 17.8%Migdalia Martinez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.