Speaker summary
75%1 analyzed article/video212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Migdalia Martinez results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 73.3% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 741.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,816 of 38,731 speakers). This Migdalia Martinez is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Migdalia Martinez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
31%Migdalia Martinez (selected)19%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.8% percentile
18.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos212 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 73.3%73.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.5%7.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 73.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos