Previously deported Mexican national sentenced to 20 years for sexual exploitation of Utah minor 13%

By Thomas Stevenson59%

7/31/2026, 12:19:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 374 faulty-reasoning hits from 318 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (22,714 of 26,004 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the article peer group.

A Mexican national residing in Utah who illegally entered the US has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for the sexual exploitation of two minors as well as illegal reentry into the US after being deported. 
Erik Santana-Garcia, 34, was sentenced by U.S. 
District Judge Greg Kays to 20 years in prison without parole as well as a lifetime of supervised release after he pleaded guilty earlier this year to transporting a minor female from Utah across state lines with the intent to engage in sexual exploitation of the minor. 
Santana-Garcia had intended to go to New York but was stopped in Missouri on November 12, 2024 by police with the Oak Grove, Missouri Police Department. 
Investigators with the Department of Homeland Security also found child pornography on his phone depicting a second minor when his device was seized during his arrest. 
Santana-Garcia had been previously deported and removed from the United States "on multiple occasions," according to the Department of Justice. 
His most recent removal was in March 2019. 
According to the Office of the Inspector General for the Social Security Administration, the minor was 15 years of age. 
Santana-Garcia, also known as "Erik Cayetano," was also charged with possession of a firearm as an alien at the time of his arrest. 
The case is being prosecuted by the Assistant U.S. 
Attorney Alison Dunning and was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations and the Oak Grove, Missouri Police Department. 
The case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, which is a nationwide project to combat child sexual exploitation that was launched in 2006. 
It was also part of Operation Take Back America, which seeks to "repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.3%Thomas Stevenson: 8.8%The Post Millennial: 6.6%Confirmation Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.0%The Post Millennial: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 36.2%Thomas Stevenson: 14.0%The Post Millennial: 10.8%Framing Effect36.2%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 32.1%Thomas Stevenson: 9.7%The Post Millennial: 9.2%Negativity Bias32.1%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.9%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 3.0%The Post Millennial: 1.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.5%The Post Millennial: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.7%The Post Millennial: 1.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Thomas Stevenson: 3.3%The Post Millennial: 2.1%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.6%The Post Millennial: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.2%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 5.8%The Post Millennial: 4.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.3%The Post Millennial: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.3%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion12.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.8%The Post Millennial: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.6%The Post Millennial: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.3%Thomas Stevenson: 1.3%The Post Millennial: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 1.0%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.0%The Post Millennial: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 4.2%The Post Millennial: 4.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 2.4%The Post Millennial: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.0%The Post Millennial: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Thomas Stevenson: 8.7%The Post Millennial: 5.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias12.3%This article: 0.0%Thomas Stevenson: 0.4%The Post Millennial: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

318 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers25%attributed speech239writer words
100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words49% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Operation Take Back America: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.