Publication summary
80% 11 analyzed articles/videos 4,845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CNN Politics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 3,036 hits . Analysis detected 24,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,008 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 74% (142 of 542 publications). This CNN Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 21,008
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles21K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 14.4% 14.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst