Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Noticer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 751 hits . Analysis detected 3,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 91% (827 of 8,347 authors). This The Noticer is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. The Noticer
Author details
Total words: 2,052
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.1% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 36.6% 36.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.9% 23.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 16.3% 16.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.9%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst