Author summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genevieve Gluck results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 741 hits. Analysis detected 3,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (2,049 of 8,348 authors). This Genevieve Gluck is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Genevieve Gluck
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠76%Genevieve Gluck (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

76% percentile
025507510075.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.2%16.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos