Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Lindfield results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 619 hits . Analysis detected 4,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,820 of 8,359 authors). This David Lindfield is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. David Lindfield
Author details
Total words: 3,340
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.7% 7.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.7% 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst