Speaker summary
55% 32 analyzed articles/videos 710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Health Organization results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anchoring Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 197 hits . Analysis detected 1,526.746 faulty-reasoning hits from 710 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 5% (24,484 of 25,757 speakers). This World Health Organization is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. World Health Organization
Speaker details
Total words: 710
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 6.7% BS Score32 analyzed videos710 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 24.8% 24.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst