Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pilar Tomas - Senior visual journalist results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 835 hits . Analysis detected 3,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,869 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,199 authors). This Pilar Tomas - Senior visual journalist is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Pilar Tomas - Senior visual journalist
Author details
Total words: 4,869
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst