What breathing wildfire smoke does to your body  and how to stay safe 29%

By Dr. Farhan M. Asrar0%

7/16/2026, 12:59:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 1,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 920 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,125 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the article peer group.

I woke up today seeing that my windows appeared to have an yellow/orange tint to them, signalling that wildfire smoke was upon my city and reminding us that climate-related hazards are increasingly becoming visible parts of our daily lives. 
I’m a family physician, public health physician and medical educator. 
My work and research in space medicine has also given me a unique appreciation for planetary environments, and as I looked out at the orange haze, I could not help but reflect on how this view resembles the dust-filled skies astronauts will one day encounter when viewing the Martian landscape. 
The current wildfires in Northern Ontario are impacting not just surrounding regions but a large swath of eastern North America, with wildfire smoke travelling far beyond the immediate fire zone and affecting communities hundreds of kilometres away. 
As I write this, Toronto has the worst recorded air quality in the world. 
Millions across the United States are also being impacted by wildfire smoke originating from Canadian wildfires. 
A triple threat 
The triple threat of wildfire, poor air quality and extreme heat have been impacting countries around the world, including Canada, the United States and European nations. 
Climate change is creating conditions that are increasingly favourable for wildfires, including hotter temperatures. 
Wildfire smoke can travel long distances, impacting air quality and increasing health risks for populations far removed from the original wildfire. 
Wildfire smoke is a dangerous mixture of gases, fine particles and chemicals. 
The primary health concern is fine particulate matter (PM₂. 
₅). 
These particles can easily bypass the body’s defences, penetrate deep into the lungs and may enter the bloodstream, contributing to inflammation and systemic health effects. 
Other harmful components in wildfire smoke include carbon monoxide, ozone, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. 
Additionally, the convergence of air pollution, wildfire smoke and extreme heat represents a growing global health threat, with compounding effects that increase acute illness, worsen chronic diseases and contribute to preventable deaths. 
The impact on health 
Wildfire smoke reduces air quality and causes air pollution. 
Air pollution is a major concern for morbidity and mortality around the world. 
The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates air pollution is responsible for seven million premature deaths annually and is responsible for more than 17,000 deaths in Canada, over 180,000 in Europe and around 200,000 in the U.S. annually. 
Not only that, air pollution has become the second leading risk factor for death and also the second leading death risk factor globally for children under the age of five. 
Air pollution affects not only mortality rates but also quality of life and chronic disease management, and adds significant strain to an already overburdened health system. 
Who’s most at risk? 
Those who are at increased risk include children, older adults, pregnant people and those with pre-existing health conditions like asthma, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. 
We frequently notice increases in respiratory symptoms, ER visits, hospital admissions, worsening of underlying medical conditions and even death during such periods of either extreme heat, poor air quality, and/or wildfires. 
Even those who are otherwise healthy can be affected, particularly people who work outdoors and those who participate in strenuous outdoor activities (including sports and physical exercise outdoors). 
Dr. 
Farhan M. 
Asrar is an Associate Dean —Clinical Faculty Relations, School of Medicine, Toronto Metropolitan University. 
This article was first published by The Conversation and is republished under a Creative Commons licence. 
Read the original article. 
Symptoms commonly seen include cough, shortness of breath, wheezing, chest discomfort, headache, dizziness and irritation of the eyes, nose and throat. 
It can also lead to triggering or worsening of pre-existing medical conditions, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. 
I was part of a national initiative by the College of Family Physicians of Canada and Health Canada, where I educated physicians across Canada on managing environmental health issues. 
I have seen the importance of translating environmental health warnings into practical actions that protect patients and communities. 
How to stay safe 
My recommendations include: 
Stay informed: Keep an eye out for air quality statements/warnings, and monitor the Air Quality Index/Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) for your region. 
The AQHI is designed to help people understand what air quality means for their health and steps to take to reduce exposure. 
Reduce exposure: When air quality is poor, limit time outdoors, avoid strenuous outdoor activities, consider exercising indoors and postpone or reschedule outdoor activities when possible. 
It’s important to check forecasts and plan activities accordingly. 
Those with asthma and other health conditions should ensure they have their medications and puffers readily available. 
Individuals should also ensure their home is adequately sealed from smoke infiltration, and consider the use of air purifiers. 
An N95 respirator can provide additional protection when going outdoors. 
Seek medical attention: Those experiencing symptoms related to the exposure, or worsening of underlying medical conditions should seek medical attention promptly. 
Check in on vulnerable populations: Given the heightened risk of preventable illness and death from wildfire smoke, extreme heat and air pollution, proactive outreach to vulnerable family members, neighbours, patients and others during environmental health emergencies is essential, particularly for older adults, socially isolated individuals and those with chronic medical conditions. 
As climate-related hazards become more frequent and severe, protecting our health will require moving beyond warnings toward prevention. 
This will require stronger connections among public health, health-care systems and communities to ensure people have the knowledge, resources and support needed to prepare and respond before emergencies occur. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.5%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 5.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 2.9%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect11.5%This article: 11.3%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 2.8%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion11.3%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.5%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias2.0%This article: 3.5%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 1.4%The Independent: 1.5%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 23.8%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 10.4%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias23.8%This article: 3.2%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.8%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 2.8%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.8%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 2.1%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope2.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.4%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.8%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization3.4%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.8%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 1.7%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion6.8%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 1.5%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.4%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.5%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 3.7%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.7%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 2.4%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.7%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.1%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 1.5%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice1.1%This article: 17.9%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 15.9%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination17.9%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Dr. Farhan M. Asrar: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.1%

920 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers5.8%attributed speech867writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWorld Health Organization (WHO) • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageThe Conversation • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words70% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination-19.0 ptsWriter: 19.0%World Health Organization (WHO): 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%World Health Organization (WHO): 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%World Health Organization (WHO): 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.