Speaker summary
50%8 analyzed articles/videos178.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Health Organization (WHO) results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 86.807 hits. Analysis detected 341.705 faulty-reasoning hits from 178.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,120 of 28,364 speakers). This World Health Organization (WHO) is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
13.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos178.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate