Topic summary
24% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heat results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 2,034 hits . Analysis detected 12,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,342 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (13,502 of 15,403 topics). This Heat is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Heat
Topic details
Total words: 17,342
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst