Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dr. Farhan M. Asrar results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 2,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,196 authors). This Dr. Farhan M. Asrar is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dr. Farhan M. Asrar
Author details
Total words: 3,680
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 15.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst