Author summary
2%5 analyzed articles/videos455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Hagerty results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 869 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,473 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,984 of 6,364 authors). This Michael Hagerty is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Michael Hagerty
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
38%Michael Hagerty (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,473
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.9%2.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate