Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Musto results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 911 hits . Analysis detected 12,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,242 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,704 of 6,135 authors). This Julia Musto is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group. Julia Musto
Author details
Total words: 15,242
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst