Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Io Dodds results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 961 hits . Analysis detected 7,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,897 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,917 of 6,164 authors). This Io Dodds is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Io Dodds
Author details
Total words: 9,897
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst