Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Cuthbertson results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 2,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,461 of 6,162 authors). This Anthony Cuthbertson is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Anthony Cuthbertson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
44%Anthony Cuthbertson (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,168
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.8%10.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos