MAHA’s latest conspiracy? Blaming Bill Gates for spike in tick bites 44%

By Julia Musto0%

5/19/2026, 9:50:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 178 hits. Analysis detected 1,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 610 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.3% and a BS Rank of 44% (11,432 of 20,157 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the article peer group.

The next MAHA conspiracy is about this year’s record tick season, it involves Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates  and it was also disproven three years ago. 
Social media users are claiming the billionaire philanthropist bred and released ticks with alpha-gal syndrome, which causes life-threatening allergic reactions to red meat. 
The MAHA Moms Coalition asked farmers to come forward to confirm whether boxes of ticks were being left on their land. 
The ticks theory alleges that Gates wants to turn consumers toward the plant-based meat products he has invested in, though people sharing it did not provide any evidence for those claims. 
The syndrome is also tied to Lone Star ticks, which are completely different from those in a British research program to genetically modify cattle ticks funded partially by Gates, according to a 2023 fact-check by The Associated Press, after the same conspiracy theory made an earlier appearance. 
The theory has an unnerving amount of online support, despite being false. 
One video comment about Gates’ responsibility got more than 122,000 likes on Instagram this past week. 
Still, that’s not the only crazy tick conspiracy social media users have been propping up since 2023. 
The Covid vaccine-maker Pfizer is also to blame, some users claim, solely for the reason that the company has been working on a vaccine for Lyme disease. 
Users allege Pfizer planted ticks, too, to increase demand for their upcoming product. 
”Did y’all know Pfizer started working on a tick vaccine in 2021 and is set to release in 2027,” wrote user @colinfrank. 
“What f-----n timing huh.” 
Pfizer actually announced the plans in 2020 and said it was planning submissions to regulatory authorities after announcing the vaccine was more than 70 percent effective in preventing Lyme disease last March. 
There is “no evidence to support these claims,” the non-profit-formed Public Health Communications Collaborative says. 
The Collaborative was formed amid the Covid-19 pandemic. 
“Other posts falsely claimed that the vaccine, which targets a protein in the bacteria that causes Lyme disease, is mRNA-based and repeated myths about mRNA vaccine safety,” it said. 
Vaccine hesitancy has been a major factor doctors have cited in the resurgence of once-eliminated measles and record flu seasons. 
Neither the Gates Foundation nor Pfizer immediately replied to The Independent’s request for comment on the matter. 
And, these aren’t the first tick conspiracies to spread widely. 
A previously circulated theory alleged that Lyme disease originated from a Cold War-era U.S. bioweapons program at New York’s Plum Island Animal Disease Center. 
That’s something even Health and Human Service Sec. 
Robert F. 
Kennedy, Jr., said he “probably” promoted. 
It’s been fact-checked by the American Lyme Disease Foundation. 
Joellen Lampman, the tick and school IPM coordinator at Cornell University’s Integrated Pest Management Program, told The Independent she’s been hearing about Plum island since she began educating people on tick protection. 
“I have stopped trying to dispute it and begun asking questions. 
‘What if it is true?’ 
‘How does that change your desire/need to protect yourself from a tick bite?’ 
Because I believe if we blame issues on nefarious ‘others,’ then we remove our confidence that we can protect ourselves,” she said. 
“After that exchange, we can more easily discuss what steps to take.” 
And the real explanation for the most tick-related ER visits in nearly a decade? 
Well, human actions do contribute to rising risks. 
”Warmer, shorter winters combine with changes in how we manage our landscapes, reduced wildlife diversity, invasive species (both plants that enhance tick habitat and different tick species) and how we interact with our environments to increase the risk of tick-borne diseases,” Lampman explained. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.6%Julia Musto: 3.7%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias6.6%This article: 3.6%Julia Musto: 0.9%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.6%This article: 15.6%Julia Musto: 4.0%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic15.6%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 1.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.3%Julia Musto: 0.6%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias4.3%This article: 5.2%Julia Musto: 2.4%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias5.2%This article: 6.2%Julia Musto: 3.2%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect6.2%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.6%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.3%Julia Musto: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.0%Julia Musto: 5.9%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.1%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Julia Musto: 4.7%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.2%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Julia Musto: 2.7%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error8.5%This article: 3.3%Julia Musto: 0.4%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.4%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 2.0%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Julia Musto: 2.5%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias8.4%This article: 9.5%Julia Musto: 0.9%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Julia Musto: 0.1%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 2.8%Julia Musto: 0.1%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man2.8%This article: 29.2%Julia Musto: 5.5%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority29.2%This article: 5.2%Julia Musto: 1.0%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.5%Julia Musto: 6.0%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization9.5%This article: 7.7%Julia Musto: 0.4%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring7.7%This article: 10.5%Julia Musto: 1.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon10.5%This article: 10.0%Julia Musto: 2.0%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion10.0%This article: 4.4%Julia Musto: 1.2%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question4.4%This article: 9.7%Julia Musto: 5.4%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 2.8%Julia Musto: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque2.8%This article: 14.9%Julia Musto: 1.1%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof14.9%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 7.0%Julia Musto: 1.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division7.0%This article: 15.2%Julia Musto: 2.7%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal15.2%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Julia Musto: 2.3%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.7%Julia Musto: 0.3%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground5.7%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 3.9%Julia Musto: 0.6%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy3.9%This article: 15.7%Julia Musto: 2.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote15.7%This article: 15.2%Julia Musto: 2.3%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection15.2%This article: 12.0%Julia Musto: 4.5%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice12.0%This article: 12.1%Julia Musto: 2.4%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination12.1%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.3%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julia Musto: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Julia Musto: 0.8%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.4%

610 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers48%attributed speech319writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMAHA Moms Coalition • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageThe Associated Press • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage@colinfrank • 22 words • 100.0% coverage@colinfrank • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coveragePublic Health Communications Collaborative • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coveragePublic Health Communications Collaborative • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageRobert F. Kennedy, Jr. • 6 words • 100.0% coverageAmerican Lyme Disease Foundation • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJoellen Lampman • 32 words • 100.0% coverageJoellen Lampman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJoellen Lampman • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoellen Lampman • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJoellen Lampman • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJoellen Lampman • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLampman • 43 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

@colinfrank

100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words8.9% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+95.6 ptsWriter: 4.4%@colinfrank: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+73.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%@colinfrank: 84.6%84.6%Biased Writer Voice-22.9 ptsWriter: 22.9%@colinfrank: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%@colinfrank: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.