Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ticks results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,427 hits. Analysis detected 10,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,994 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (11,572 of 15,142 topics). This Ticks is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Ticks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,994
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos