Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conspiracy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,359 hits. Analysis detected 9,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,130 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (6,895 of 15,256 topics). This Conspiracy is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Conspiracy
Topic details
Total words: 7,130
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos