Keyword summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 10,658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Gates results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 2,658 hits . Analysis detected 27,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,459 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (33,480 of 34,040 keywords). This Bill Gates is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Bill Gates
Keyword details
Total words: 47,459
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles47.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst