Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michel Martin results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 623 hits . Analysis detected 4,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,457 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (841 of 6,171 authors). This Michel Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Michel Martin
Author details
Total words: 2,457
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 5.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.8% 15.8% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 15.9% 15.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.4% 25.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 21.6% 21.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 15.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.6% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst