Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Viruses results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,852 hits. Analysis detected 11,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,431 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,908 of 34,832 keywords). This Viruses is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Viruses
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
9%Viruses (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 17,431
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate