Speaker summary
68% 10 analyzed articles/videos 445.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Scott results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 129.976 hits . Analysis detected 831.415 faulty-reasoning hits from 445.333 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,775 of 28,364 speakers). This Tim Scott is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Tim Scott
Speaker details
Total words: 445.333
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 7.0% BS Score10 analyzed videos445.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 26.1% 26.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst