Speaker summary
53%31 analyzed articles/videos1,553.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Massie results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 446.178 hits. Analysis detected 2,380.759 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,553.333 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (25,869 of 26,155 speakers). This Thomas Massie is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
3.6% BS Score31 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

US and Israel Military Integration: What NDAA Vote Does and Does Not Do14%
Newsweek32%By Ellie Cook25%7/23/2026, 12:14:39 PM
US House passes $1.15 trillion military bill expanding Israel cooperation88%
Al Jazeera57%By Al Jazeera Staff54% Reuters69% The Associated Press65%7/23/2026, 12:29:52 AM
GOP Rep. Called Israeli–U.S. Defense Tech Integration “Dangerous.” The House Passed It Anyway.19%
The Intercept81%By Austin Campbell62%7/22/2026, 10:13:33 PM
Top House Democrat Cites Vandalism, Arson, and Assault by Anti-Israel Activists as He Votes to Cut Israel Aid76%
Algemeiner.com0%By Corey Walker0%7/17/2026, 3:27:00 PM
Trump’s Delusional Election Fraud Speech Sparks 25th Amendment Calls95%
The New Republic71%By Malcolm Ferguson72%7/17/2026, 2:53:06 PM
Trump’s Election Fraud Speech Was a Sick Joke—and a Threat86%
The Nation78%By Jeet Heer91%7/17/2026, 1:44:11 PM
This Vote on Israeli Aid Reveals Just How Over the Cliff Democrats Are Going76%
RedState91%By Nick Arama94%7/16/2026, 8:30:00 PM
Kansas U.S. House delegation in unison on funding for Israel75%
Little Apple Post0%7/16/2026, 6:00:00 PM
Washington still voted to send Israel $3.3 billion in aid — but over half of the House Democrats revolted54%
Fortune52%By Lisa Mascaro53% Nick Lichtenberg62% The Associated Press65%7/16/2026, 12:21:28 PM
US House defeats bid to cut off Israel aid in vote dividing Democrats72%
Geo News0%By Reuters69%7/16/2026, 11:13:00 AM