Speaker summary
59% 38 analyzed articles/videos 2,806.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Farms results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 625.59 hits . Analysis detected 3,658.312 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,806.5 analyzed words across 38 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,651 of 26,837 speakers). This Taylor Farms is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Taylor Farms
Speaker details
Total words: 2,806.5
Content count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score38 analyzed videos2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 22.3% 22.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst